IELTS Writing(8) - 모의 문제와 모범 답변

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Some people want governments to spend money looking for life on other planets.
Others, however, think this is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
You should write at least 250 words.

 

 

There are two contrasting perspectives on whether governments should invest in the search for extraterrestrial life. Proponents argue that it is crucial to find alternative habitable planet, while opponents maintain that it is a misuse of public funds when there are pressing issues on Earth that require immediate attention.

 

Advocates of space exploration believe that investing in the search for life beyond Earth is a vital investment in a nation's future. They contend that the problems on our planet, such as global warming and the spread of deadly viruses like COVID-19, underscore the need for finding alternative habitats. As sea levels rise and the Earth becomes increasingly uninhabitable, governments must explore options like colonizing Mars. Notably, NASA and private companies in the United States have already made significant strides in studying Mars, yielding promising results.

 

Conversely, ciritics assert that allocating public money to space exploration is a waste when there are pressing issues on Earth that demand immediate investment. They argue that governments should prioritize addressing poverty and crime, which are inextricably linked. Public funds should be directed towards welfare programs that support the underprivileged, infrastructure development in underdeveloped and dangerous urban areas, and job creation initiatives for young people. These investments, they maintain, are far more critical than funding scientific exploration of the universe.

 

In my opinion, the search for extraterrestrial life is of paramount importance, and governments should allocate public funds to this endeavor. The competition among developed nations to lead in space exploration is fierce, and countries that fail to invest in this area risk falling behind and becoming depenent on leading nations like the United States and China.

 

In conclusion, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I believe that investing in the search for life beyond Earth is a necessary step for any nation that wishes to remain competitive in the future. By balancing investments in space exploration with addressing pressing domestic issues, governments can ensure a sustainable and prosperous future for their citizens.

 

 

• extraterrestrial (외계의, 외계인의)
  : alien, unearthly
  
  
• proponent (지지자, 찬성론자)
  : advocate, supporter
  
  
• opponent (반대자, 적)
  : adversary, rival
  
  
• pressing (긴급한, 절박한)
  : urgent, critical
  
  
• underscore (강조하다, 중요성을 나타내다)
  : emphasize, highlight
  
  
• colonize (식민지로 만들다, 정착하다)
  : settle, inhabit
  
  
• stride (큰발짝, 진전)
  : progress, advancement
  
  
• prioritize (우선순위를 두다, 중시하다)
  : focus on, give precedence to
  
  
• inextricably (떼려야 뗄 수 없는, 밀접하게 연관된)
  : inseparably, inherently connected
  
  
• be directed towards (~을 향하다, ~을 목표로 하다)
  : be aimed at, be focused on
  
  
• underprivileged (혜택을 받지 못한, 불우한)
  : disadvantaged, deprived
  
  
• initiative (계획, 주도권)
  : plan, proposal, scheme
  
  
• is of paramount importance (극히 중요하다, 최우선적이다)
  : is of utmost importance, is of the highest priority
  
  
• fierce (맹렬한, 극심한)
  : intense, ferocious
  
  
• compelling (설득력 있는, 납득할 만한)
  : persuasive, convincing

 

---

문제 출처:  IELTS Mock Test 2024 January Writing Practice Test 3

ieltsonlinetests.com